Monday, November 24, 2008
My wife and I are heading to London for Thanksiving, so there will be no rankings updates next week until Monday at the earliest. Sadly, I don't expect to be able to watch many American football games in the UK, but we are staying with friends near the Arsenal stadium, so maybe there's some (rest-of-the-world) football in store this week. Have a safe and happy holiday with your families, friends, pets, selves, or whoever else you choose to spend your Turkey Day with. Oh yes, and TO HELL WITH GEORGIA!
Sunday, November 23, 2008
Week 13 Top 30
1 | 1.000000 | Utah (12-0) | 5 | 0.027047 |
2 | 0.999699 | Florida (10-1) | 4 | 0.026104 |
3 | 0.995251 | Penn State (11-1) | 6 | 0.029491 |
4 | 0.994186 | Oklahoma (10-1) | 8 | 0.033734 |
5 | 0.979003 | Boise State (11-0) | 3 | -0.002624 |
6 | 0.976928 | Alabama (11-0) | 2 | -0.010024 |
7 | 0.957872 | Ball State (11-0) | 9 | 0.008179 |
8 | 0.954559 | USC (9-1) | 7 | -0.010075 |
9 | 0.93774 | TCU (10-2) | 11 | 0.031446 |
10 | 0.931148 | Texas (10-1) | 10 | -0.010987 |
11 | 0.923985 | Texas Tech (10-1) | 1 | -0.076014 |
12 | 0.874979 | Ohio State (10-2) | 13 | 0.026092 |
13 | 0.836298 | Missouri (9-2) | 14 | -0.010875 |
14 | 0.835573 | Oklahoma State (9-2) | 15 | -0.010159 |
15 | 0.820875 | BYU (10-2) | 12 | -0.070711 |
16 | 0.813122 | Tulsa (9-2) | 18 | 0.030654 |
17 | 0.804114 | Georgia (9-2) | 16 | -0.010326 |
18 | 0.766769 | Oregon State (8-3) | 20 | 0.021392 |
19 | 0.763216 | Cinncinati (9-2) | 22 | 0.023842 |
20 | 0.748928 | Western Michigan (9-2) | 19 | -0.011551 |
21 | 0.74577 | Florida State (8-3) | 28 | 0.040393 |
22 | 0.730755 | Iowa (8-4) | 32 | 0.047492 |
23 | 0.726844 | Oregon (8-3) | 23 | -0.010686 |
24 | 0.725986 | Boston College (8-3) | 27 | 0.01824 |
25 | 0.722268 | Georgia Tech (8-3) | 30 | 0.028851 |
26 | 0.717566 | Michigan State (9-3) | 17 | -0.067485 |
27 | 0.704622 | Rice (8-3) | 33 | 0.021552 |
28 | 0.700936 | West Virginia (7-3) | 36 | 0.032554 |
29 | 0.694972 | Northwestern (9-3) | 34 | 0.021162 |
30 | 0.684136 | Central Michigan (8-3) | 24 | -0.047901 |
Week 13 Bottom 10
111 | 0.217063 | Western Kentucky (2-9) | 113 | -0.009232 |
112 | 0.210841 | Iowa State (2-10) | 110 | -0.036407 |
113 | 0.205008 | Utah State (2-9) | 114 | -0.00909 |
114 | 0.177636 | Miami (Ohio) (2-9) | 111 | -0.054932 |
115 | 0.13322 | San Diego State (2-10) | 118 | 0.050892 |
116 | 0.107043 | Idaho (2-10) | 115 | -0.047076 |
117 | 0.086231 | SMU (1-10) | 116 | -0.008812 |
118 | 0.054761 | North Texas (1-10) | 117 | -0.03935 |
119 | 0.030706 | Washington State (2-10) | 120 | 0.030706 |
120 | 0.000000 | Washington (0-11) | 119 | -0.033727 |
The Thing About NCAA Games On Sunday...
...Is that it makes you all have to wait for your rankings fix! Week 13 rankings will be posted following the conclusion of UConn@USF game tonight (or possibly early tomorrow). But here's a sneak preview: it looks like Florida will stay in front of all the other 1-loss teams and probably even jump some undefeated teams who had byes this week or eked out wins over lesser competition.
Monday, November 17, 2008
Week 12 Top 30
1 | 1.000000 | Texas Tech (10-0) | 1 | 0.000000 |
2 | 0.986952 | Alabama (11-0) | 4 | 0.032583 |
3 | 0.981627 | Boise State (10-0) | 3 | 0.026702 |
4 | 0.973594 | Florida (9-1) | 9 | 0.052853 |
5 | 0.972952 | Utah (11-0) | 6 | 0.035039 |
6 | 0.96576 | Penn State (10-1) | 7 | 0.029084 |
7 | 0.964634 | USC (9-1) | 5 | 0.026682 |
8 | 0.960451 | Oklahoma (9-1) | 2 | 0.003829 |
9 | 0.949693 | Ball State (10-0) | 8 | 0.020203 |
10 | 0.942135 | Texas (10-1) | 10 | 0.038626 |
11 | 0.906293 | TCU (9-2) | 11 | 0.006323 |
12 | 0.891587 | BYU (10-1) | 12 | 0.033883 |
13 | 0.848887 | Ohio State (9-2) | 14 | 0.031505 |
14 | 0.847174 | Missouri (9-2) | 15 | 0.036086 |
15 | 0.845732 | Oklahoma State (9-2) | 16 | 0.03795 |
16 | 0.81444 | Georgia (9-2) | 17 | 0.035467 |
17 | 0.785052 | Michigan State (9-2) | 19 | 0.010159 |
18 | 0.782468 | Tulsa (8-2) | 13 | -0.061828 |
19 | 0.760479 | Western Michigan (9-2) | 22 | 0.035606 |
20 | 0.745377 | Oregon State (7-3) | 26 | 0.053929 |
21 | 0.74374 | Air Force (8-3) | 18 | -0.034904 |
22 | 0.739374 | Cinncinati (8-2) | 24 | 0.04117 |
23 | 0.737531 | Oregon (8-3) | 27 | 0.046108 |
24 | 0.732038 | Central Michigan (8-2) | 28 | 0.044714 |
25 | 0.725121 | Pittsburgh (7-2) | 23 | 0.011995 |
26 | 0.712751 | North Carolina (7-3) | 20 | -0.034807 |
27 | 0.707745 | Boston College (7-3) | 37 | 0.052817 |
28 | 0.705377 | Florida State (7-3) | 21 | -0.03583 |
29 | 0.698913 | Connecticut (7-3) | 42 | 0.060791 |
30 | 0.693417 | Georgia Tech (7-3) | 30 | 0.012306 |
Week 12 Bottom 10
111 | 0.232569 | Miami (Ohio) (2-8) | 111 | 0.009381 |
112 | 0.228813 | Syracuse (2-8) | 106 | -0.012582 |
113 | 0.226296 | Western Kentucky (2-9) | 112 | 0.003646 |
114 | 0.214099 | Utah State (2-9) | 114 | 0.013267 |
115 | 0.15412 | Idaho (2-9) | 115 | 0.007056 |
116 | 0.095043 | SMU (1-10) | 116 | -0.013648 |
117 | 0.094112 | North Texas (1-9) | 118 | 0.035198 |
118 | 0.082328 | San Diego State (1-10) | 117 | 0.002124 |
119 | 0.033727 | Washington (0-10) | 119 | 0.009229 |
120 | 0.000000 | Washington State (1-10) | 120 | 0.000000 |
Monday, November 10, 2008
Numbers out the ying-yang
After reviewing the Week 10 Top 24, a loyal reader had the following question:
Allow me to shed some light on the subject (hopefully). Let's first review how the formula works. Basically, I take the record, total points, yards, and turnovers for each team in every game played so far. Then I calculate two subscores using the difference between a team's and their opponents' numbers and a ratio. I average these two values together to get a final subscore. To determine the SOS for a team, I take 67% of each opponent's subscore and 33% of each opponent's opponent's subscore. Going back to the subscores, the record gets a 50% weighting, then 35% goes to the statisical subscores (each stat is weighted roughly the same), and then 15% goes to SOS. This yields a ratio score and a difference score. I average these two and quantize between 1 and 0 to get the final score you see posted on the site. So to figure out why a team has a higher score than another team, you have to look at the individual components, both for difference and ratio. The "per game" numbers aren't really used in the calculations, but provide a clearer barometer of a team's performance than totals when viewing the numbers prior to season's end. The efficiencies shown below (also not directly used in any calculations) are based on scoring 70 points for every 80 yards of offense. It's an arbitrary adjustment, I realize, but a telling statistic nonetheless.
Confused yet? Okay, let's start with Penn State and Texas Tech. The difference components are roughly the same, but Penn State leads in every ratio component, and has a higher SOS value. I know, I know, the Big 12 is "better" than the Big Te(leve)n, but look at who each team has played through week 10. I have no doubt that TTU's final SOS will be higher than PSU, but up until that point, PSU does have the slight edge. More importantly, look at the efficiencies: Penn State scores more often with less yardage and allows fewer points and fewer yards, and they almost never turned the ball over.
As for TCU over Alabama, the Horned Frogs have superior numbers in every offensive and defensive category. Alabama's got SOS cornered and of course has a better record, but it's the massive discrepancy in the statistical categories that was keeping TCU just ahead of an undefeated 'Bama team.
"What is making Penn State appear higher than Texas Tech, and a one-loss TCU higher than undefeated Alabama?"
Allow me to shed some light on the subject (hopefully). Let's first review how the formula works. Basically, I take the record, total points, yards, and turnovers for each team in every game played so far. Then I calculate two subscores using the difference between a team's and their opponents' numbers and a ratio. I average these two values together to get a final subscore. To determine the SOS for a team, I take 67% of each opponent's subscore and 33% of each opponent's opponent's subscore. Going back to the subscores, the record gets a 50% weighting, then 35% goes to the statisical subscores (each stat is weighted roughly the same), and then 15% goes to SOS. This yields a ratio score and a difference score. I average these two and quantize between 1 and 0 to get the final score you see posted on the site. So to figure out why a team has a higher score than another team, you have to look at the individual components, both for difference and ratio. The "per game" numbers aren't really used in the calculations, but provide a clearer barometer of a team's performance than totals when viewing the numbers prior to season's end. The efficiencies shown below (also not directly used in any calculations) are based on scoring 70 points for every 80 yards of offense. It's an arbitrary adjustment, I realize, but a telling statistic nonetheless.
Points | 376 | 423 | 366 | 290 |
Rank | 7 | 3 | 9 | 26 |
PPG | 41.77 | 47 | 36.6 | 32.22 |
Rank | 8 | 3 | 17 | 33 |
Yards | 4138 | 5034 | 4085 | 3321 |
Rank | 9 | 2 | 13 | 49 |
YPG | 459.77 | 559.33 | 408.5 | 369 |
Rank | 12 | 2 | 29 | 61 |
Tos Committed | 8 | 12 | 11 | 12 |
Rank | 5 | 32 | 24 | 25 |
TO/G | 0.88 | 1.33 | 1.1 | 1.33 |
Rank | 4 | 28 | 10 | 22 |
Points | 100 | 202 | 108 | 110 |
Rank | 4 | 53 | 5 | 7 |
PPG | 11.11 | 22.44 | 10.8 | 12.22 |
Rank | 4 | 47 | 3 | 6 |
Yards | 2393 | 3146 | 2145 | 2263 |
Rank | 12 | 66 | 4 | 7 |
YPG | 265.88 | 349.55 | 214.5 | 251.44 |
Rank | 6 | 56 | 2 | 4 |
Tos Forced | 18 | 22 | 26 | 16 |
Rank | 43 | 13 | 2 | 59 |
TO/G | 2 | 2.44 | 2.6 | 1.77 |
Rank | 47 | 20 | 9 | 67 |
Points | 276 | 221 | 258 | 180 |
PPG | 30.66 | 24.56 | 25.8 | 20 |
Yards | 1745 | 1888 | 1940 | 1058 |
YPG | 193.89 | 209.78 | 194 | 117.56 |
TO Margin | 10 | 10 | 15 | 4 |
TO/G | 1.12 | 1.11 | 1.5 | 0.44 |
Points | 3.76 | 2.094 | 3.389 | 2.636 |
PPG | 3.757 | 2.094 | 3.389 | 2.637 |
Yards | 1.729 | 1.600 | 1.904 | 1.468 |
YPG | 1.729 | 1.600 | 1.904 | 1.468 |
TO Margin | 2.25 | 1.833 | 2.364 | 1.333 |
TO/G | 2.273 | 1.835 | 2.364 | 1.331 |
SOS Score | 0.3407 | 0.2832 | 0.2581 | 0.4657 |
Rank | 88 | 92 | 101 | 56 |
Off. Effic. | 103.84% | 96.03% | 102.39% | 99.79% |
Rank | 7 | 22 | 11 | 17 |
Def. Effic. | 47.75% | 73.38% | 57.54% | 55.55% |
Rank | 4 | 38 | 11 | 8 |
Confused yet? Okay, let's start with Penn State and Texas Tech. The difference components are roughly the same, but Penn State leads in every ratio component, and has a higher SOS value. I know, I know, the Big 12 is "better" than the Big Te(leve)n, but look at who each team has played through week 10. I have no doubt that TTU's final SOS will be higher than PSU, but up until that point, PSU does have the slight edge. More importantly, look at the efficiencies: Penn State scores more often with less yardage and allows fewer points and fewer yards, and they almost never turned the ball over.
As for TCU over Alabama, the Horned Frogs have superior numbers in every offensive and defensive category. Alabama's got SOS cornered and of course has a better record, but it's the massive discrepancy in the statistical categories that was keeping TCU just ahead of an undefeated 'Bama team.
Sunday, November 09, 2008
Week 11 Top 30
1 | 1.000000 | Texas Tech (10-0) | 2 | 0.026738 |
2 | 0.956622 | Oklahoma (9-1) | 6 | 0.041147 |
3 | 0.954924 | Boise State (9-0) | 5 | 0.034686 |
4 | 0.954369 | Alabama (10-0) | 4 | 0.011629 |
5 | 0.937952 | USC (8-1) | 8 | 0.033828 |
6 | 0.937912 | Utah (10-0) | 7 | 0.022505 |
7 | 0.936675 | Penn State (9-1) | 1 | -0.063324 |
8 | 0.929489 | Ball State (9-0) | 10 | 0.038874 |
9 | 0.920741 | Florida (8-1) | 9 | 0.024967 |
10 | 0.903508 | Texas (9-1) | 11 | 0.02553 |
11 | 0.899969 | TCU (9-2) | 3 | -0.054264 |
12 | 0.857703 | BYU (9-1) | 14 | 0.032477 |
13 | 0.844297 | Tulsa (8-1) | 13 | -0.005626 |
14 | 0.817381 | Ohio State (8-2) | 16 | 0.048969 |
15 | 0.811088 | Missouri (8-2) | 15 | 0.032403 |
16 | 0.807781 | Oklahoma State (8-2) | 12 | -0.066665 |
17 | 0.778973 | Georgia (8-2) | 18 | 0.033962 |
18 | 0.778645 | Air Force (8-2) | 20 | 0.044048 |
19 | 0.774892 | Michigan State (9-2) | 17 | 0.025426 |
20 | 0.747558 | North Carolina (7-2) | 24 | 0.04699 |
21 | 0.741207 | Florida State (7-2) | 23 | 0.038962 |
22 | 0.724873 | Western Michigan (8-2) | 27 | 0.035338 |
23 | 0.713126 | Pittsburgh (7-2) | 33 | 0.062624 |
24 | 0.698203 | Cinncinati (7-2) | 32 | 0.043222 |
25 | 0.696969 | Arizona (6-3) | 34 | 0.051021 |
26 | 0.691447 | Oregon State (6-3) | 36 | 0.055373 |
27 | 0.691422 | Oregon (7-3) | 31 | 0.032622 |
28 | 0.687324 | Central Michigan (7-2) | 28 | 0.004872 |
29 | 0.683989 | California (6-3) | 21 | -0.050249 |
30 | 0.681111 | Georgia Tech (7-3) | 22 | -0.049969 |
Week 11 Bottom 10
111 | 0.223187 | Miami (Ohio) (2-7) | 109 | -0.012375 |
112 | 0.222649 | Western Kentucky (2-8) | 110 | -0.004149 |
113 | 0.204228 | UAB (2-7) | 114 | 0.030306 |
114 | 0.200831 | Utah State (2-8) | 111 | -0.013253 |
115 | 0.147064 | Idaho (2-8) | 115 | 0.033142 |
116 | 0.108692 | SMU (1-9) | 116 | 0.010113 |
117 | 0.080203 | San Diego State (1-9) | 117 | -0.002898 |
118 | 0.058913 | North Texas (1-9) | 118 | -0.00456 |
119 | 0.024497 | Washington (0-9) | 119 | 0.003248 |
120 | 0.000000 | Washington State (1-9) | 120 | 0.000000 |
Monday, November 03, 2008
Week 10 Top 24
1 | 1.000000 | Penn State (9-0) | 1 | 0.000000 |
2 | 0.973261 | Texas Tech (9-0) | 3 | 0.037676 |
3 | 0.954234 | TCU (9-1) | 4 | 0.036851 |
4 | 0.94274 | Alabama (9-0) | 6 | 0.04209 |
5 | 0.920238 | Boise State (8-0) | 10 | 0.048112 |
6 | 0.915474 | Oklahoma (8-1) | 9 | 0.040274 |
7 | 0.915406 | Utah (9-0) | 7 | 0.024752 |
8 | 0.904124 | USC (7-1) | 11 | 0.043145 |
9 | 0.895773 | Florida (7-1) | 12 | 0.049601 |
10 | 0.890614 | Ball State (8-0) | 8 | 0.002161 |
11 | 0.877977 | Texas (8-1) | 2 | -0.06483 |
12 | 0.874447 | Oklahoma State (8-1) | 13 | 0.039667 |
13 | 0.849923 | Tulsa (8-1) | 5 | -0.064691 |
14 | 0.825226 | BYU (8-1) | 15 | 0.027163 |
15 | 0.778684 | Missouri (7-2) | 19 | 0.020979 |
16 | 0.768412 | Ohio State (7-2) | 17 | 0.002006 |
17 | 0.749466 | Michigan State (8-2) | 20 | 0.027757 |
18 | 0.74501 | Georgia (7-2) | 14 | -0.069774 |
19 | 0.739583 | Minnesota (7-2) | 16 | -0.044598 |
20 | 0.734596 | Air Force (7-2) | 25 | 0.033734 |
21 | 0.734238 | California (6-2) | 22 | 0.029765 |
22 | 0.731081 | Georgia Tech (7-2) | 27 | 0.033045 |
23 | 0.702244 | Florida State (6-2) | 18 | -0.056458 |
24 | 0.700568 | North Carolina (6-2) | 26 | 0.001835 |
Week 10 Bottom 10
111 | 0.214085 | Utah State (2-7) | 114 | 0.056555 |
112 | 0.213722 | Eastern Michigan (2-8) | 110 | -0.035378 |
113 | 0.211885 | Michigan (2-7) | 108 | -0.040466 |
114 | 0.173921 | UAB (2-7) | 109 | -0.076235 |
115 | 0.113922 | Idaho (2-8) | 115 | -0.025113 |
116 | 0.098579 | SMU (1-8) | 117 | -2.46E-4 |
117 | 0.083102 | San Diego State (1-8) | 116 | -0.043166 |
118 | 0.063474 | North Texas (1-8) | 120 | 0.063474 |
119 | 0.021249 | Washington (0-8) | 118 | -0.048068 |
120 | 0.000000 | Washington State (1-8) | 119 | -0.052782 |
Sunday, November 02, 2008
Tech 31, F$U 28! Whooo!!!
For the first time since F$U joined the ACC following Georgia Tech's 1990 National Championship season, GT beat the Criminoles. What used to be a great rivalry (if you can call a 12-game losing streak a rivalry) fell by the wayside with ACC expansion, but this year, my beloved Jackets finally got the monkey off their backs. And I was there to witness it! As such, this week's rankings will be posted tomorrow, and there should be some interesting moving and shaking going on with PSU on a bye, Texas losing to Texas Tech,and U(sic)GA getting demolished by the Gators at the World's Largest Outdoor [REDACTED] Party in Jacksonville.