The Battle for Conference Supremacy
1 | SEC | 41.667 |
2 | Big East | 43.875 |
3 | Big 10 | 48.455 |
4 | Big XII | 49.750 |
5 | Pac 10 | 53.500 |
6 | ACC | 56.333 |
7 | MWC | 58.667 |
8 | WAC | 69.667 |
9 | CUSA | 74.000 |
10 | Sun Belt | 80.750 |
11 | MAC | 80.917 |
12 | IND | 81.600 |
1 | SEC | 0.623 |
2 | Big East | 0.605 |
3 | Big XII | 0.585 |
4 | Big 10 | 0.574 |
5 | Pac 10 | 0.553 |
6 | ACC | 0.529 |
7 | MWC | 0.514 |
8 | WAC | 0.437 |
9 | CUSA | 0.408 |
10 | MAC | 0.380 |
11 | IND | 0.363 |
12 | Sun Belt | 0.355 |
3 Comments:
SEC! SEC! SEC!
Any changes you're going to make for next season's scoring?
By scafidi, at 1/14/2008 2:07 PM
I'm looking at doing something based on offensive and defensive efficiency as an alternate scorign method. It would still take wins and probably SOS into account, but rather than using raw yards/points/TOs, it would be something along the lines of points/yard. More points in fewer yards means you're winning the field position game by getting better kick returns or forcing turnovers near the goal. On defense, forcing a team to punt or attempt a field goal is leading to lower points per yard gained. Anyway, I have to crunch some numbers still, but I'll keep you posted.
By Rev. Adam, at 1/21/2008 11:15 AM
Hello. This post is likeable, and your blog is very interesting, congratulations :-). I will add in my blogroll =). If possible gives a last there on my blog, it is about the DVD e CD, I hope you enjoy. The address is http://dvd-e-cd.blogspot.com. A hug.
By Anonymous, at 4/10/2008 4:43 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home